Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Order Of Battle's avatar

Regarding the BBG(X), I agree that the ship in its current form is not mature enough. It relies too heavily on speculative and immature technologies, such as the electromagnetic railgun. Ultimately, the physical size of a warship predicates the size, height, and power output required to enable its radar to operate effectively.

For this reason, I strongly believe large surface combatants are vital to future force composition. That said, the BBG(X) design is both enormous and enormously expensive. Projections suggest that each vessel is likely to cost a similar amount to a Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier—albeit minus the air wing and with a smaller crew, which translates to far lower life-cycle costs.

Instead, I think the Navy should invest in large warships built in the vein of the DDG(X) at around 13,000 tons. Specifically, I would recommend a cruiser class of around 12 to 16 ships displacing 18,000 tons light to 25,000 tons at full load. This high mass could host a massive Vertical Launch System (VLS) capacity, expansive power-generation capabilities, and immensely powerful radars and sensors, while still undercutting the BBG(X) by 15,000 to 20,000 tons in displacement.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?